首页> 外文OA文献 >Is standardized care feasible in the emergency setting? A case matched analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
【2h】

Is standardized care feasible in the emergency setting? A case matched analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

机译:在紧急情况下标准化护理是否可行?腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的病例匹配分析。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Immediate laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the accepted standard for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of a standardized approach with tailored care maps for pre- and postoperative care by comparing pain, nausea and patient satisfaction after elective and emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy.From January 2014 until April 2015, data on pain and nausea management were prospectively recorded for all elective and emergency procedures in the department of visceral surgery. This prospective observational study compared consecutive laparoscopic elective vs. emergency cholecystectomies. Visual analogue scales (VAS) were used to measure pain, nausea, and satisfaction from recovery room until 96 hours postoperatively.Final analysis included 168 (79%) elective cholecystectomies and 44 (21%) emergent procedures. Demographics (Age, gender, BMI and ASA-scores) were comparable between the 2 groups. In the emergency group, patients did not receive anxiolytic medication (0% vs.13%, p = 0.009) and less postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis (77% vs. 97% p = <0.001). Perioperative pain management was similar in terms of opioid consumption (median amount of fentanyl 450ug [IQR 350-500] vs. 450ug [375-550], p = 0.456) and wound infiltration rates (24% vs. 25%, p = 0.799). Postoperative consumption of paracetamol, metamizole and opiod medications were similar between the 2 groups. VAS scores for pain (p = 0.191) and nausea (p = 0.392) were low for both groups. Patient satisfaction was equally high in both clinical settings (VAS 8.5 ± 1.1 vs. 8.6 ± 1.1, p = 0.68).A standardized pathway allows equally successful control of pain and nausea after both elective and emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study was retrospectively registered by March 01, 2016 in the following trial register: www.researchregistry.com (UIN researchregistry993).
机译:立即腹腔镜胆囊切除术是治疗急性胆囊炎的公认标准。本研究的目的是通过比较选择性和紧急腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的疼痛,恶心和患者满意度来评估采用量身定制的护理图的标准化方法在手术前后的可行性.2014年1月至2015年4月,疼痛数据前瞻性地记录了内脏外科所有选择性和急诊程序的恶心和恶心处理。这项前瞻性观察研究比较了连续腹腔镜选择性胆囊切除术和紧急胆囊切除术。视觉模拟量表(VAS)用于测量康复室至术后96小时的疼痛,恶心和满意度。最终分析包括168例(79%)择期胆囊切除术和44例(21%)紧急手术。两组的人口统计学(年龄,性别,BMI和ASA得分)相当。在紧急情况下,患者未接受抗焦虑药物治疗(0%比13%,p = 0.009),术后预防恶心和呕吐(PONV)的比例较低(77%比97%p = 0.001)。就阿片类药物的消耗(芬太尼450ug [IQR 350-500]的中位数与450ug [375-550]的中位数,p = 0.456)和伤口浸润率(24%vs. 25%,p = 0.799)而言,围手术期疼痛管理相似。 )。两组之间的对乙酰氨基酚,间咪唑和阿片类药物的术后消耗量相似。两组的疼痛(p = 0.191)和恶心(p = 0.392)的VAS评分均较低。在两种临床情况下患者满意度均很高(VAS 8.5±1.1,vs 8.6±1.1,p = 0.68)。标准化的途径可以在选择性和急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术后同样成功地控制疼痛和恶心。该研究已于2016年3月1日在以下试验注册中进行回顾性注册:www.researchregistry.com(UIN researchregistry993)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号